猴哥的2000到2022年阅读理解真题逐篇解析，目前看的人并不多，课程注重实战训练，有的不是书本上可以看到的，我们说的阅读策略与技巧一定要管用，这种技巧不是浅层次的总结，是对于阅读理解本质与测试学的深度解读。考虑到很多学生没有购买课程，我只是把昨天的视频简单扼要阐述下，希望感兴趣的同学可以看看。
考研阅读在做题中，首先看题干，对于选项不要急于去看，不然首要的印象就会被选项削弱了，我们大脑要是白纸去接受最核心的意思。下面以2010年阅读第4篇为例。
Bankers have been blaming themselves for their troubles in public. Behind the scenes, they have been taking aim at someone else: the accounting standard-setters. Their rules, moan the banks, have forced them to report enormous losses, and it's just not fair. These rules say they must value some assets at the price a third party would pay, not the price managers and regulators would like them to fetch.
Unfortunately, banks' lobbying now seems to be working. The details may be unknowable, but the independence of standard-setters, essential to the proper functioning of capital markets, is being compromised. And, unless banks carry toxic assets at prices that attract buyers, reviving the banking system will be difficult.
After a bruising encounter with Congress, America's Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) rushed through rule changes. These gave banks more freedom to use models to value illiquid assets and more flexibility in recognizing losses on long-term assets in their income statement. Bob Herz, the FASB's chairman, cried out against those who "question our motives." Yet bank shares rose and the changes enhance what one lobby group politely calls "the use of judgment by management."
European ministers instantly demanded that the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) do likewise. The IASB says it does not want to act without overall planning, but the pressure to fold when it completes it reconstruction of rules later this year is strong. Charlie McCreevy, a European commissioner, warned the IASB that it did "not live in a political vacuum" but "in the real word" and that Europe could yet develop different rules.
It was banks that were on the wrong planet, with accounts that vastly overvalued assets. Today they argue that market prices overstate losses, because they largely reflect the temporary illiquidity of markets, not the likely extent of bad debts. The truth will not be known for years. But bank's shares trade below their book value, suggesting that investors are skeptical. And dead markets partly reflect the paralysis of banks which will not sell assets for fear of booking losses, yet are reluctant to buy all those supposed bargains.
To get the system working again, losses must be recognized and dealt with. America's new plan to buy up toxic assets will not work unless banks mark assets to levels which buyers find attractive. Successful markets require independent and even combative standard-setters. The FASB and IASB have been exactly that, cleaning up rules on stock options and pensions, for example, against hostility from special interests. But by giving in to critics now they are inviting pressure to make more concessions.
36. Bankers complained that they were forced to
[A] follow unfavorable asset evaluation rules
[B] collect payments from third parties
[C] cooperate with the price managers
[D] reevaluate some of their assets.
这一题比较容易定位，只要找到forced ，看看强迫干什么去了， forced them to report enormous losses, and it's just not fair. These rules say they must value some assets at the price a third party would pay, not the price managers and regulators would like them to fetch.
注意must，必须，强迫之意，谁强迫的，these rules, 看看选项A, FOLLOW, RULES.明白了没有。这是写文章可能没有视频解析来的直接，但是简单语言，胜过你看的解析书，感兴趣的可以去看我的2000-2022历年阅读解析。
37. According to the author , the rule changes of the FASB may result in
[A] the diminishing role of management
[B] the revival of the banking system
[C] the banks' long-term asset losses
[D] the weakening of its independence
找到rule changes. through rule changes. These gave banks more freedom to use models to value illiquid assets and more flexibility in recognizing losses on long-term assets in their income statement.
看到没有，核心意思，more, 就是多的意思，选项一定会有多少之意思。少也是同意替换，就比如，说一个女孩漂亮，其实就是不丑，哈哈，懂了吧，别看这一点启示，胜过你自己摸索好多篇。选项出现多少的含义词汇， diminishing ，weakening答案就这这二个，而D， independence对应freedom.想想看，文章的二个家伙，一个银行，一个会计规则制定者，一个自由多，一个就少，这就是同一语义场。
38. According to Paragraph 4, McCreevy objects to the IASB's attempt to
[A] keep away from political influences.
[B] evade the pressure from their peers.
[C] act on their own in rule-setting.
[D] take gradual measures in reform.
答案处，warned the IASB that it did "not live in a political vacuum 注意想表达的核心，就是真空，就是隔绝，隔绝就是自己玩，选项有own,神奇不，这就是答案。
39. The author thinks the banks were "on the wrong planet" in that they
[A] misinterpreted market price indicators
[B] exaggerated the real value of their assets
[C] neglected the likely existence of bad debts.
[D] denied booking losses in their sale of assets.
答案处It was banks that were on the wrong planet, with accounts that vastly overvalued assets. Today they argue that market prices overstate losses, 夸大，缩小，类型的词汇，对应exaggerate,比较简单，有的同学说because后面不是答案吗，除非人家问你为什么，不然就是个从句而已，不是答案。记住：主句是句子核心。
40. The author's attitude towards standard-setters is one of
对于这种题，找到一处几乎就可以做出来，看看对银行的用词Unfortunately, banks' lobbying now seems to be working. 哈哈，那就是同情对方了。
好了，我的解析比较自然，打字不舒服，这是我视频配套课的压缩版，欢迎关注，咨询。
/1 
1603
